About us

The best result for
every client

Our objective on every engagement is to add value to the motor claims settlement process by enabling the most prompt cost-effective resolution of a claim.

We are committed to achieving the best result possible for every client. We recognise our clients need results in a timely, efficient manner, and in a way that embraces the values of both APU and the client. 

 

APU-5

Our people

At the core of what we do are our people – APU is made up of highly experienced individuals with decades of experience in various aspects of motor claims settlement. We blend this unique experience with bespoke analysis technology and techniques.

We promote a team culture, in which we support, challenge and develop staff to remain responsive to the ever-changing needs of our clients and the motor claims environment.

We are forward- thinking and embrace a more transparent and accountable industry, in which we will deliver a service tailored to the requirements of our clients.

With the experience, energy, enthusiasm and willingness to ‘go the extra mile’ that is inherent in our team, we deliver results and add value to our clients.

APU-2
“I have found APU reports to be extremely useful; both with regard to proving hire periods are reasonable and justified, and in providing contemporaneous BHR evidence which is detailed and highly case specific. They have undoubtedly assisted in the success of many of my cases.”
Elinor Hoile, Kings Bench Chambers
“TRUE Solicitors LLP credit hire department has been using the services of APU Ltd for many years now. They provide us with detailed statements addressing the period of hire, concise BHR evidence, and also Locus Reports for liability disputed cases. All of which have proved an invaluable resource helping us give best advice to our clients, and playing an important part in the ongoing success of our department.”
Chris Jehan

True Solicitors

“APU – the period statements are invaluable as evidence. Because they are in chronological order, they show clearly the progress of the repairs and, consequently, the period of hire. They also demonstrate where the responsibility for delays in the procedure fall which is so important when a defendant attempts to argue for a reduction in period. So far, I have never known a Judge to dispute them.”
Kathy Anderson

Kings Bench Chambers